Mag locks (also called door strike electric locks) are a popular electromagnetic lock system for doors that integrates with modern access control systems. They are ideal for less-trafficked areas and buildings with back or side doors that must be regularly monitored. They're also highly reliable and durable against intruders.
This article will explore the differences between mag lock vs electric strike to help property managers decide which electromagnetic lock system is best for them.
Cost
Mag locks have higher installation costs than electric strikes and are less adaptable. The type of door in question also plays a role. Doors that need to be secured for high-security reasons, such as IT servers or package rooms, usually call for magnetic locks. For security and safety reasons, these doors must often remain locked during power outages.
However, many building managers prefer electric strike locks for these same reasons. They are more adaptable and can be updated remotely through an intelligent access management platform.
Mag lock vs electric strike also require an electrical connection to function, which makes them ideal for areas that need access control during a blackout. They can be configured to be fail-secure or stay locked even without power, preventing people from entering priority areas during emergencies like fires. However, when power is restored, they allow for egress through the standard door handle. These are great for doors that need more robust security but still want to allow employees and visitors to exit freely during emergencies.
Durability
Evaluating your building's needs and use cases is essential when deciding whether to install a magnetic lock or an electric strike on the building. This will allow you to weigh each electromagnetic door release system's benefits, drawbacks, and costs.
Mag locks require a backup power supply to remain functional during a power outage. They must also be tethered to fire alarm systems for override in an emergency. Strikes are fail-secure devices that remain locked even during a power outage.
Moreover, electric strikes are less expensive than magnetic locks and are easy to install. All you have to do is remove the existing strike plate and replace it with an electric strike that matches your door hardware. Then, wire it to your access control system and test it for functionality. Furthermore, recent innovations in electrical strike technology have made them more compatible and flexible. These include adjustable strike plates and intelligent management capabilities that enable remote monitoring.
Security
Mag lock vs electric strike are popular door security options in modern access control systems. However, they each have distinct mechanisms and applications better suited to specific settings. An electric strike is an electrically triggered mechanism that replaces the traditional lock plate in a doorway. It typically activates an electronic signal from a keypad, FOB, swipe card, or buzzer. Their strikes are versatile and can be configured to remain locked during power outages.
They can be used in areas that require fail-safe and fail-secure mechanisms to comply with local safety codes, such as warehouses, IT server rooms, and inventory closets. They can also be installed on high-traffic doors, such as stairwells and entryways, to keep unauthorized individuals out. Electric strikes are less costly to install than mag locks since they require fewer alterations to the existing door frame and hardware. They also draw less electricity during activado, so they don't need to be energized as mag locks constantly do.
Installation
Choosing between mag lock vs electric strike depends on each doorway's needs and uses. Having both systems installed for maximum security can be advantageous. However, this option should always be evaluated against the overall costs and safety of the building or rooms.
Electric strikes are more easily adapted to meet fire and life safety codes than mag locks. Additionally, they are often less expensive than mag locks since they require fewer modifications to the door and frame. They are also easier to install, especially in older buildings where preserving the frame's and hardware's integrity is essential. In addition, they allow people to exit a room without a key during emergencies or power outages. These benefits are significant in spaces that have to meet accessibility regulations. They are also ideal for doors that have aesthetic concerns, such as architecturally beautiful glass doors. Keeping one side of the door open for egress is also helpful in spaces that only need to control traffic in one direction.
コメント